On 16.02.2013 19:07, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:48:42 -0600 > "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: >> >> I plan to tag between late Friday 15 Feb eve, and Saturday. The >> remaining STATUS items only have a vote or two, or are contested >> and can't really be expected to hit this tag. It might be a bit >> late to add more to STATUS for consideration, but if you were >> going to evalute any of these patches, now is your opportunity. > > Shifting this to Mon 18 Feb afternoon to be in sync with 2.4.4, so > feel free to work on late additions this weekend through STATUS.
Info: I ran the test suite and got no unknown or unexpected failures (details see below). Tested configuration: - current 2.2.x HEAD with APR/APU 1.4.6/1.5.1 - using shared modules "all" - tested for prefork, worker and event - each MPM tested with log level info and debug - platform Solaris 10 Sparc 32 Bit build - Libraries Expat 2.1.0 and PCRE 8.32 (or both bundled), OpenSSL 1.0.1e with a few patches - Tool chain: gcc 4.7.2, CFLAGS -O2 -g -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing -mpcu=v9 Known or expected failures: t/security/CVE-2005-3352.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 1) Failed test: 2 It fails, because the test is already adjusted for a 2.4 backport that's waiting for the third vote in 2.2 STATUS (last item in the proposed backports list). t/security/CVE-2008-2364.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 2-3 Perl problem, no regression. t/ssl/extlookup.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1) Failed test: 2 t/ssl/require.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 1) Failed test: 9 Both fail at least since 2.2.16, so no regression. Regards, Rainer
