On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:55:15 -0400 Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:08:00PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > On Wednesday 12 June 2013, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > 2 backport proposals looking 4 3vote-luv > > > > > * skiplist: Add skiplist functionality > > > > There doesn't seem to be any user of the skiplist than > > register_timed_callback, and there doesn't seem to be any user of > > register_timed_callback besides mod_dialup.c. Is mod_dialup really > > that important? And is the inefficiency there a big problem? Maybe > > we could wait until there are more users of the API? > > They are useful. My question is not whether that feature is useful, rather whether this belongs in httpd, or is a better candidate for apr? A consolidated patch of a 14-commit patchlist would be much easier to review :) My question on mod_proxy_wstunnel is whether it can be considered stable, or is (and should be documented as) experimental, in which case I'd ask if $proxy_mods_enable is really the right default, or whether the user should enable it explicity?
