On Jun 18, 2013, at 9:31 AM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > I will be removing this backport request, but I'd ask sf to > actually address his concerns by actually working on the code > instead of just blocking it for whatever reason. > > Wow! Stefan raised a number of issues in STATUS which are spot-on > considerations when someone wants to merge a feature* from trunk to a stable > branch. It is great that he took the time to dig through it and comment on > it, and it is hard to see your comments here as even remotely pertinent to > his concerns. > I instead saw it as simple justifications for him to block it. It's obvious that he doesn't see the need for it and so instead of seeing the potential and working on making it more useful to address needs that he sees, he simply noted concerns. Yes, the documentation stuff makes sense. It's the sense of working with existing stuff to try to make it better or the viewpoint that "I don't like it so forget it."
