On Wednesday 12 June 2013 21:18:05 Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Tuesday 11 June 2013, André Malo wrote: > > > trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1491155 > > > 2.4.x patch: trunk patch works > > > nd: why would you do that in a stable branch? > > > > > > + sf: Because it is only annoying and serves no purpose > > > anymore. If you + want, we can make it a minor MMN bump > > > for adding a "new" API. +1: sf, covener > > > > > > -1: nd > > > > Long discussions in STATUS are kinda tedious ;-) > > > > Well, I think, such changes are what trunk is for. Why not simply > > leave everything below as-is? Even more if it removes only an > > annoyance? Or is there a real technical reason I'm just not seeing > > right now?
[...] > > Or, is there a real technical reason to keep it broken in 2.4? Annoying rhetoric games aside - we went from "only annoying" to "broken". What is it now? No other opinion on this? nd
