On Jun 14, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote:
> > We do cosmetical changes in stable branches like e.g. reducing code > drift between trunk and 2.4 or fixing typos in comments. Of course. That's not the question (at least IMO). The question is that when a cosmetic change also results in a functional change (and we wouldn't be suggesting MMN bumps if it wasn't), that it becomes a change that should be proposed as a backport and not willy-nilly added. We have a process, and should discourage attempts to bypass it on a stable trunk. FWIW, I'd be +1 with the bump.
