On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:07 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net>wrote:
> Devs, > > I plan to tag both the 2.0 and 2.2 trees now that they look relatively > stable, given that we are a couple weeks beyond the originally discussed > 2.0/2.2/2.4 simultaneous release. There is one backport to apply in 2.2 > and we had been waiting for Jeff to confirm that the proposed security > fix now addresses all of his issues now in the 2.0 tree. Ouch! I do remember rjung (?) leaving a note in STATUS (?) but I had scrolling inbox+disorganization syndrome. I'll play with that now. Sorry! > I have free > time to do this tomorrow late afternoon, so if anyone has their fingers > in the trees with last minute work, send me a heads up so I can avoid > colliding with your efforts. > > If there is a 2.4 vote proceeding smoothly we can always defer the > announce so that there is a single, clear message we recommend 2.4, > that 2.2 is a maintenance release for legacy users, and that 2.0 > represents the final release of that software and that it will no > longer be maintained by the project. > -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
