On 6/21/2013 10:19 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:27:14 -0400 > Daniel Ruggeri <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Nothing to stall the work, but I'd like to campaign once more for a >> quick look at the 2.2 backport I have outstanding (which was added to >> 2.4 already). > Which, the one which is approved, or failontimeout?
Sorry - I should have been more clear. The failontimeout balancer parameter is the one still up for votes while the AuthLDAPBindPassword patch has been accepted. I see you JUST added a vote, so thanks for that :-) -- Daniel Ruggeri
