The main thing is that it would be interesting to see the diffs between '2.4.6 w the (several) originally proposed UDS patches applied in order' and '2.4.6 w proposed backport'...
Those diffs should show just the differences between the UDS implementations... On Nov 19, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: > Yes, agreed. Not sure if I made it clear, but I did apply r1511313 for > the tests I did today (but not the one from yesterday). > > Of the several emails sent, the following have been tested: > 2.4.6 w the (several) originally proposed UDS patches applied in order > 2.4.6 w proposed backport (the 2 chunks around the DNS changes fail to > apply since they do not exist in 2.4.6) > 2.4.6 w r1511313 + proposed backport + r1543174 > > I DID double check that the machine wasn't requesting DNS lookups for > the socket name or anything strange against the DNS server - but that > was only for the test I ran today. > > -- > Daniel Ruggeri > > On 11/19/2013 1:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> OK... the DNS lookup code seems to have changed between 2.4.6 and 2.4.7: >> >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1511313 >> >> So I'm wondering if there's something there. >
