Jim Jagielski wrote: > I offered to RM but OtherBill said he'd do it; plus, last > time I did, I used more up-to-date versions of autoconf, et.al. > and OtherBill complained that for the 2.2 built, we should > continue to use the much older versions... > > FWIW, I still can't recall which old version numbers we > should be using for 2.2... :/
Digging through the archives reveals: On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:00:52 -0500 Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > So what versions of autoconf and libtool should we > be baselining for 2.2.x? On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:56:39 -0600 "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > Libtool 1.5.26 and autoconf 2.67 were used for 2.2.25 release; any > later 1.5 libtool or 2.6x series autoconf aught to work but you would > want to pre- buildconf and review any newer versions before tagging. Regards Rüdiger
