OK... created a CentOS5 system w/ libtool 1.5.26 and autoconf 2.69, so I can RM 2.2.x!
On Aug 21, 2014, at 12:26 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > I have a CentOS 5 system that may have those older versions... > CentOS 6 uses libtool 2.2.6b... > > Let me check and, if so, I can RM. > > Thx! > On Aug 21, 2014, at 7:59 AM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> >> Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> I offered to RM but OtherBill said he'd do it; plus, last >>> time I did, I used more up-to-date versions of autoconf, et.al. >>> and OtherBill complained that for the 2.2 built, we should >>> continue to use the much older versions... >>> >>> FWIW, I still can't recall which old version numbers we >>> should be using for 2.2... :/ >> >> Digging through the archives reveals: >> >> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:00:52 -0500 >> Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> >>> So what versions of autoconf and libtool should we >>> be baselining for 2.2.x? >> >> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:56:39 -0600 >> "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: >> >>> Libtool 1.5.26 and autoconf 2.67 were used for 2.2.25 release; any >>> later 1.5 libtool or 2.6x series autoconf aught to work but you would >>> want to pre- buildconf and review any newer versions before tagging. >> >> >> Regards >> >> Rüdiger >> >
