The idea is that being a project with a long, long history, httpd has the unfortunate reputation of being old, slow, and basically, not the new hotness. So even though the project has been around, 2.4 is vastly different, and really should be seen and considered as a whole new web server.
> On Nov 30, 2014, at 11:13 AM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > > On Nov 29, 2014 9:45 AM, "Jim Jagielski" <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > > > I'd like to submit something like "This ain't your Daddy's Apache!"... > > Does that replace one of the ones already listed or is that a new item? > > > > > On Nov 26, 2014, at 1:04 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> I've started an doc at > > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/11oh1CQEwgxvV_xM92kQyRP8HuI92VHuN5znNz-5-Qwg/edit?usp=sharing > > >> and I'm hoping that we can collaborate on what talks need to be in a > > >> comprehensive httpd track, what order they should be in, and then hunt > > >> down > > >> the people that should be giving those talks. > > > > > > Thanks for kickstarting -- I added a very simple bullet for "What’s > > > (still new) in 2.4" > >
