On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Ewald Dieterich <ew...@mailbox.org> wrote:
> Any ideas how to fix this so that this situation is handled as a single
> error and not as two errors mixed up?
>
in mod_proxy.c you will see at least 1 stanza like this:
status = ap_get_brigade(r->input_filters, temp_brigade,
AP_MODE_READBYTES, APR_BLOCK_READ,
MAX_MEM_SPOOL - bytes_read);
if (status != APR_SUCCESS) {
ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, status, r, APLOGNO(01095)
"prefetch request body failed to %pI (%s)"
" from %s (%s)",
p_conn->addr, p_conn->hostname ? p_conn->hostname: "",
c->client_ip, c->remote_host ? c->remote_host: "");
return HTTP_BAD_REQUEST;
}
The proper pattern in 2.4.x and later is to not return an error like that:
return ap_map_http_request_error(status, HTTP_BAD_REQUEST);
In the case of that -102 error, the -102 will be returned verbatim
instead (AP_FILTER_ERROR). Are you able to test and verify?
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
