All of them are needed.

Regards

Rüdiger

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:[email protected]]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2015 08:12
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: RE: Time for 2.4.11
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> I just checked and found the most recent commits regarding to
> "SO_REUSEPORT" patch work is done on Dec 4, 2014 with trunk version
> 1643179. There are also other commits done on this patch work as well.
> Please let me know if you need commits ID from all of them or the most
> recent one is good enough. I can help you find if you want.
> 
> Thanks,
> Yingqi
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:35 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Time for 2.4.11
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Thanks very much for your replies. I do not think there is a 2.4
> backport patch available. All my previous work are on top of the trunk
> version. However, I think you may be able to apply the svn commits on
> 2.4 since the work is pretty much self-contained.
> 
> Please let me know if that works for you.
> 
> Thanks,
> Yingqi Lu
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:07 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Time for 2.4.11
> 
> I haven't had time to check... is there an actual 2.4 backport patch
> available, or do I need to craft one (or do the svn commits apply
> cleanly)??
> > On Jan 14, 2015, at 12:20 PM, Lu, Yingqi <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I just want to check what the status on the "SO_REUSEPORT" patch is.
> Do you see any issues backport it? Please let me know.
> >
> > Attached is the email I sent last week on the same topic in case you
> missed that.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yingqi
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 4:54 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Time for 2.4.11
> >
> > Get your backports into STATUS now, and test and vote on the existing
> (and to-be-entered) proposals asap!
> >
> >> On Jan 13, 2015, at 12:05 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Okey dokey... the idea is a T&R on Thurs with a release next
> Mon/Tues.
> >>
> >>> On Jan 8, 2015, at 6:11 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Let's shoot for a T&R next week. The work will keep me warm :)
> >>
> >
> > <RE Time for 2.4.11.msg>

Reply via email to