Thanks for this information and all the help! I will ping you back when 2.4.12 window opens :-)
Thanks, Yingqi -----Original Message----- From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Time for 2.4.11 I try to do a release every 3-4 months, but this one lagged behind. > On Jan 15, 2015, at 12:41 PM, Lu, Yingqi <[email protected]> wrote: > > By the way, do you have an estimate on when is the 2.4.12? > > I guess I will ping you back when the window opens for 2.4.12! > > Thanks, > Yingqi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lu, Yingqi > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:39 AM > To: httpd > Subject: RE: AW: Time for 2.4.11 > > Hi Yann, > > Thanks very much for your help! > > Yes, I think I can help to document the "ListenCoresBucketsRatio", at least > to draft it. Also, I think I can share the settings from our testing > regarding to this work. > > I will send them later this week. > > Thanks, > Yingqi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 2:06 AM > To: httpd > Subject: Re: AW: Time for 2.4.11 > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> There is still missing the "ListenCoresBucketsRatio" documentation, >> and I don't think I can do it today, could you? > > Also, would you share maybe some recommended settings > ({Min,Max}Spare*,ServerLimit, StartServer, ...) wrt bucketing and this new > directive? > > I did some testing (though with linux-3.14, and httpd-2.2.x backport of the > patch), and it seems it really helps the scalability (at the limits). > And I did not notice any special dysfunctioning either, including during > (graceful) restarts. > So +1 for me. > > But, since the patch is quite big, it may be hard for reviewers to > (in)validate today (thurs here, which seems to be the T&R date). > So maybe we can take more time for this (with a patch already available for > those who care) and wait until 2.4.12 (next next)? > What do you (reviewers) think? > > Thanks, > Yann.
