Backport proposed in r1665737 (+ r1665743).
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 >> On Jan 8, 2015, at 12:12 PM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Eric, all proxy modules concerned in trunk could be fixed with >>> "(status == AP_FILTER_ERROR) ? DONE : >>> ap_map_http_request_error(status, HTTP_BAD_REQUEST)", but not 2.4.x >>> where "(status == AP_FILTER_ERROR) ? DONE : HTTP_BAD_REQUEST)" is a >>> simple fix. >>> Should we also (propose to )backport to 2.4.x the whole >>> ap_map_http_request_error() stuff (r1482522 + r1529991 + r1482918, >>> quite huge...) so that we don't lose specific errors returned by >>> ap_http_filter (ie. turned to 400), or is the simple fix OK? >> >> my own 2 cents -- would prefer to maintain the commonality. >
