On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 5:24 PM, William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > As this is not a regression from 2.4.13 or 2.4.14 candidates, it seems to me > we should ship.
I am -1 for 2.4.15 with the regression. The other candidates being broken doesn't mitigate it much for me. -- Eric Covener [email protected]
