> On 24 Dec 2016, at 16:32, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm not saying we don't do one so we can do the other; I'm >> saying we do both, at the same time, in parallel. I still >> don't understand why that concept is such an anathema to some >> people. > > I also worry about our ability to deliver a 3.0 with enough > re-architecture for us and and function for users, vs a more > continuous delivery (apologies for bringing buzzaords to dev@httpd) > cadence on 2.4 as we've been in.
If you can find a way with limited resources, I would encourage doing both in parallel as well. What are the 2.6/3.0 re-architecture goals/vision out of curiosity? - Mark
