Very sorry Steffen, I really appreciate your effort, and enthusiasm, I read this as a direct reply to one of my notes. Blaiming my email app threading for the confusion, thanks for reconfirming to Gregg.
OSSL can't work against 1.5 APR nor 2.4.25 but I hope we have it all sorted for the next releases all around. Cheers, Bill On May 2, 2017 3:02 AM, "Steffen" <[email protected]> wrote: Gregg was wondering in one of his latest posts if this issues are still there after his commits , so I checked it and reported back here. Sorry for my posts dear Bill, looks you do not like them. You suggest that I stop reporting here. Next time I wait when RC tarballs are available. I respect you as a seasoned dev. > Op 2 mei 2017 om 08:24 heeft William A Rowe Jr <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > >> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Steffen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Resume: With next 2.4 we have two not working with 1.1. namely abs.exe with apr 1.6 and mod_session_crypto with 1.5. > > Nothing w.r.t. OSSL 1.1.x with 1.5.x apr will work, nor would 2.5.25, so tell us > something we don't know. > > But... What is the progress on fixing the BIO / constructors with OpenSSL 1.1.0 > and abs in the current 2.5-branch? Any updates folks? The httpd pipeline never > used them (Steffen, you mention you add some of the logic into your build, but > that must be for the BIO-oriented 3p modules.) But a broken ab is a showstopper.
