> Am 02.05.2017 um 11:35 schrieb Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com>: > >> Nothing w.r.t. OSSL 1.1.x with 1.5.x apr will work, nor would 2.5.25 > ( does w.r.t means: with respect to ? ) > > Again Bill, please be accurate: > > mod_ssl with OSSL 1.1 and 1.5 apr works ! > > Just build and tested it: > > [Tue May 02 11:23:54.334403 2017] [ssl:info] [pid 3948:tid 652] AH01876: > mod_ssl/2.4.26-dev compiled against Server: Apache/2.4.26-dev, Library: > OpenSSL/1.1.0e > [Tue May 02 11:23:54.334403 2017] [:notice] [pid 3948:tid 652] ModSecurity: > APR compiled version="1.5.2"; loaded version="1.5.2" > [Tue May 02 11:23:54.365670 2017] [http2:info] [pid 3948:tid 652] AH03090: > mod_http2 (v1.10.3, feats=, nghttp2 1.21.1), initializing... > [Tue May 02 11:23:54.365670 2017] [mpm_winnt:notice] [pid 3948:tid 652] > AH00354: Child: Starting 64 worker threads > I see the same under MacOS:
[Tue May 02 11:36:53.463093 2017] [http2:info] [pid 1799:tid 140736644027328] AH03090: mod_http2 (v1.10.3, feats=CHPRIO+SHA256+INVHD+DWINS, nghttp2 1.21.1), initializing... [Tue May 02 11:36:53.463160 2017] [proxy_http2:info] [pid 1799:tid 140736644027328] AH03349: mod_proxy_http2 (v1.10.3, nghttp2 1.21.1), initializing... [Tue May 02 11:36:53.464313 2017] [mpm_event:notice] [pid 1799:tid 140736644027328] AH00489: Apache/2.4.26-dev (Unix) OpenSSL/1.1.0e configured -- resuming normal operations [Tue May 02 11:36:53.464353 2017] [core:notice] [pid 1799:tid 140736644027328] AH00094: Command line: '/opt/apache-2.4.x/bin/httpd -d /Users/sei/projects/httpd/test/mod_h2/2.4.x/gen/apache' So, where do we differ? > -----Original Message----- From: William A Rowe Jr > Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 8:24 AM > To: httpd > Subject: Re: The drive for 2.4.26 > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote: >> Resume: With next 2.4 we have two not working with 1.1. namely abs.exe with >> apr 1.6 and mod_session_crypto with 1.5. > > Nothing w.r.t. OSSL 1.1.x with 1.5.x apr will work, nor would 2.5.25, so tell > us > something we don't know. > > But... What is the progress on fixing the BIO / constructors with OpenSSL > 1.1.0 > and abs in the current 2.5-branch? Any updates folks? The httpd pipeline never > used them (Steffen, you mention you add some of the logic into your build, but > that must be for the BIO-oriented 3p modules.) But a broken ab is a > showstopper.
