Until a proposal in in STATUS (and apologies if it is), its suitability for 2.4.x is a big unknown. > On May 24, 2017, at 12:42 PM, Luca Toscano <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > 2017-05-22 16:35 GMT+02:00 Jim Jagielski <[email protected]>: > I think we are *really* close! What say we try for a T&R > sometime this week? > > Who wants to RM? If no one does, I will. > > One last thing! :) > > I am wondering if we could think about reviewing/backporting to 2.4.x the > code that Yann wrote (and Stefan Priebe tested together with mod_http2 > enhancements) to allow mpm-event to use APR_POLLSET_WAKEABLE (avoiding > periodical wakeups every 100ms - IIRC - even if idling). > > It seems stable enough after some testing in a real world use case scenario. > > Yann, any opinion? > > Luca
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Stefan Eissing
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 William A Rowe Jr
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Steffen
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Stefan Eissing
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Stefan Eissing
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 William A Rowe Jr
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Gregg Smith
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 William A Rowe Jr
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Jim Jagielski
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Luca Toscano
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Jim Jagielski
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Luca Toscano
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Yann Ylavic
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Jim Jagielski
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Eric Covener
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Yann Ylavic
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Stefan Eissing
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Jim Jagielski
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 William A Rowe Jr
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Eric Covener
