Eric just noted that one viable backport hasn't been proposed yet... Jean-Frederic, can you confirm that r1792092 is something you'd like to see in 2.4.x? Other than the field addition to the struct, the change looks v. self-contained.
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Luca Toscano
- Re: The drive for 2.4.2... Jim Jagielski
- Re: The drive for 2.4.2... Luca Toscano
- Re: The drive for 2.4.2... Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
- Re: The drive for 2.4.2... Yann Ylavic
- Re: The drive for 2.4.26 Jim Jagielski
- Re: The drive for 2.4.2... Eric Covener
- Re: The drive for 2.4.2... Yann Ylavic
- Re: The drive for 2.4.2... Stefan Eissing
- Re: The drive for 2.4.2... Steffen
- r1792092 (Was: Re: The ... Jim Jagielski
- Re: The drive for 2.4.2... Steffen
- Re: Topic for discussion... 2.4.26 Christophe JAILLET
- Re: Topic for discussion... 2.4.26 Eric Covener