> FYI: I just checked in a "patches" directory inside the 2.4.x branch. > I hope it's not picked up in a source distribution.
Maybe we could have branches/2.4.x-patches instead? > > If we keep patches for backports/hot-fixes here - instead of all > over the world in not-secure http: locations - it should give us > tracking and easier use, I hope. I am not fixed on names or structure > here, just trying to keep patches where they belong and version > them. I like the idea, but since tags are copied from .x branches, they will also include the patches not yet in (heance not really related to the tag). A separate branches/2.4.x-patches wouldn't have this issue...
