> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:[email protected]] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017 13:12 > An: httpd-dev <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: backport patches > > > FYI: I just checked in a "patches" directory inside the 2.4.x branch. > > I hope it's not picked up in a source distribution. > > Maybe we could have branches/2.4.x-patches instead? > > > > > If we keep patches for backports/hot-fixes here - instead of all > > over the world in not-secure http: locations - it should give us > > tracking and easier use, I hope. I am not fixed on names or structure > > here, just trying to keep patches where they belong and version > > them. > > I like the idea, but since tags are copied from .x branches, they will > also include the patches not yet in (heance not really related to the > tag). > A separate branches/2.4.x-patches wouldn't have this issue...
Why below branches? Why not in parallel to trunk/ and branches/? But in general I agree with your point that patches below branches/2.4.x/ is not the best idea for the reasons you state. Regards Rüdiger
