+1 Regards
Rüdiger > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic....@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017 13:24 > An: httpd-dev <dev@httpd.apache.org> > Betreff: Re: backport patches > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > > <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com> wrote: > > > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic....@gmail.com] > >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017 13:12 > >> An: httpd-dev <dev@httpd.apache.org> > >> Betreff: Re: backport patches > >> > >> I like the idea, but since tags are copied from .x branches, they > will > >> also include the patches not yet in (heance not really related to the > >> tag). > >> A separate branches/2.4.x-patches wouldn't have this issue... > > > > Why below branches? Why not in parallel to trunk/ and branches/? > > ^/httpd/httpd/patches/{trunk,2.4.x,...} works for me too. > > Regards, > Yann.
