Could it be as simple as changing <SSLPolicy> to <SSLPolicyDefine> and leaving SSLPolicy as it is?
Cheers, Gillis On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Stefan Eissing < stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote: > Having slept a night over this and the mod_md config change request, I say > this leaves me somewhat sour. A request for an unspecified change by > someone important in this project is basically blocking any progress for > me. > > I am sure that was not your intention, but I feel the current choice of > naming good, because that is why they are there, and I am not convinced > that any alternative I come up with falls on fertile ground. That could > lead to a groundhog day experience with me doing the work and others > saying 'nah!' afterwards. > > This change is obviously important to you, so please lead a consensus on > how it should be changed. The code change I will then do afterwards if > no one else feels like it. > > Cheers, > > Stefan > > > Am 28.11.2017 um 16:51 schrieb Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com>: > > > > As one of the folks that answers questions on IRC, I would like to > object to the existence of SSLPolicy and <SSLPolicy>. I think it's unwise > to have two directives with the same name, for reasons of end-user support. > > > > As long as it's still only in trunk, we still have an opportunity to > avert user confusion. > > > > I request that one of these be renamed. (No, I'm not suggesting specific > names. I suck at naming things.) > > > > Thanks. > > > > --Rich > >
