Sounds like a good change if anyone asks me. :) 2017-12-04 13:39 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de>: > Thanks for all the input. What I see is consensus about the SSLPolicy change: > > 'SSLPolicy' -> stay as is > '<SSLPolicy' -> '<SSLPolicyDefine' > > (I prefer the verb above the noun here since mod_ssl uses verbs in other > config name.) > > If no one objects, I will go for this change in the next days. > > Cheers, > > Stefan > >> Am 03.12.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>: >> >> Am 28.11.2017 um 16:51 schrieb Rich Bowen: >>> As one of the folks that answers questions on IRC, I would like to object >>> to the existence of SSLPolicy and <SSLPolicy>. I think it's unwise to have >>> two directives with the same name, for reasons of end-user support. >>> As long as it's still only in trunk, we still have an opportunity to avert >>> user confusion. >>> I request that one of these be renamed. (No, I'm not suggesting specific >>> names. I suck at naming things.) >> >> What about keeping the simple SSLPolicy directive (the name of the policy to >> apply) and renaming the container directive from <SSLPolicy> to >> <SSLPolicyDefinition>. >> >> One other solution would by keeping <SSLPolicy> and rewnaming the simple >> directive to SSLPolicyApply. >> >> Regards, >> >> Rainer >
-- Daniel Ferradal IT Specialist email dferradal at gmail.com linkedin es.linkedin.com/in/danielferradal
