Thanks for all the input. What I see is consensus about the SSLPolicy change:
'SSLPolicy' -> stay as is '<SSLPolicy' -> '<SSLPolicyDefine' (I prefer the verb above the noun here since mod_ssl uses verbs in other config name.) If no one objects, I will go for this change in the next days. Cheers, Stefan > Am 03.12.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>: > > Am 28.11.2017 um 16:51 schrieb Rich Bowen: >> As one of the folks that answers questions on IRC, I would like to object to >> the existence of SSLPolicy and <SSLPolicy>. I think it's unwise to have two >> directives with the same name, for reasons of end-user support. >> As long as it's still only in trunk, we still have an opportunity to avert >> user confusion. >> I request that one of these be renamed. (No, I'm not suggesting specific >> names. I suck at naming things.) > > What about keeping the simple SSLPolicy directive (the name of the policy to > apply) and renaming the container directive from <SSLPolicy> to > <SSLPolicyDefinition>. > > One other solution would by keeping <SSLPolicy> and rewnaming the simple > directive to SSLPolicyApply. > > Regards, > > Rainer
