On 13 Dec 2017, at 2:22 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Or, it is bad form to introduce features and then force some > config-changes on users after the 'experimental' phase, which > isn't even proposed, in this case. > > We want to be pretty strict about config changes, and the > suggested white > black list behavior based on the core > enable directive would cause 2.4.x "maintenance" users > (using that term very loosely) to potentially change their > config, which I consider rude. But not everyone here has > to agree with me /shrug Are you suggesting we hold off until you had a chance to put together a patch to fix this? If so, please update STATUS to stay so. Regards, Graham —
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
