Personally, I still think that updating these fields for 2.4.x makes sense and can be justified... but am in no mood for a battle *grin*
> On Feb 7, 2018, at 10:04 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > I believe the issue are the various defines in > mod_proxy.h (eg: PROXY_WORKER_MAX_NAME_SIZE. These > have been bumped up in trunk but have not been > backported to 2.4 due to perceived API/ABI issues. > >> On Feb 7, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Just hit this error while trying to configure a load balancer: >> >> Feb 07 14:37:31 wap01 apache2[1804]: BalancerMember worker hostname >> (xxxxxx-xx-xxxxxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx.xx-xxxx-x.xxxxx-xxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxxx) too long >> >> According to RFC1035, DNS names are allowed to be 255 characters long. >> >> This is really embarrassing - just sold the idea of an httpd based load >> balancer and it breaks direct out the box. What changes do I need to make to >> fix this? Any blockers? >> >> Regards, >> Graham >> — >> >
