Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - BalancerMember worker hostname (65-character.long.DNS.name.com) too long

[Jim Jagielski]

> On Feb 7, 2018, at 10:07 AM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote:
> 
> 
> In theory, the “accept a truncated value” will work around the problem and be 
> backport-able, is that true?

+1 (assuming the truncated value is unique)