On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > So can I assume that a backport req to bump-up the field sizes to, at least, > what is in trunk, would not be vetoed?
So long as other mod_proxy_* compiled against 2.4.29 do not crash, then no - it is doesn't seem we established an ABI contract. The pairing of httpd-2.4.30 and the 2.4.30 mod_proxy_balancer are obviously in-sync.
