Bumping MMN should do that, right? > On Feb 15, 2018, at 4:41 AM, Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 06:52:28PM +0100, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 6:33 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >>> So can I assume that a backport req to bump-up the field sizes to, at least, >>> what is in trunk, would not be vetoed? >> >> Not by me, +1. > > It's not getting a veto from me, but as an FYI I know there is at least > one module (mod_cluster) which breaks when proxy_shared_worker is > extended, because it has some fixed dependency on > sizeof(proxy_shared_worker), e.g. it's used in a memcpy or something. > We saw a similar case with mod_wsgi and sizeof(request_rec) a while ago. > > I think it's always reasonable to extend structs unless we document an > explicit ABI guarantee around *not* doing that, so the third-party > modules have to deal with this. > > Regards, Joe
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - Balancer... Graham Leggett
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - Bal... Jim Jagielski
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... Graham Leggett
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance - Bal... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... Graham Leggett
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... William A Rowe Jr
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... Jim Jagielski
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... Jim Jagielski
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... Yann Ylavic
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... Joe Orton
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... Jim Jagielski
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... William A Rowe Jr
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... Graham Leggett
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... William A Rowe Jr
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... Jim Jagielski
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... Ruediger Pluem
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... William A Rowe Jr
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... Stefan Eissing
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... William A Rowe Jr
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... William A Rowe Jr
- Re: BalancerMember and RFC1035 compliance -... Graham Leggett