Thanks, this is useful. At first blush, this looks like there is a crap-ton of stuff in trunk than can, and should, be quickly and easily backported to 2.4 asap!!
> On Sep 12, 2018, at 10:06 AM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:49 AM Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com > <mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote: > As I said before, the main assumption in my suggestion is that there are > things in trunk that "really should" be in some releasable version > > Everything in trunk is now digested into three groups of commits, for > inspection. These don't include whitespace changes, so the resulting files > may be mis-indented and otherwise skewed, but we are looking for changes, not > insignificant formatting; > > Just the docs (sources, and generated) > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1840682 > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1840682> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1840684 > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1840684> > > Just win32 generated build gunk (presuming vcproj and CMake are both winners, > there is a discussion to be had on .mak files before this gap is addressed) > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1840687 > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1840687> > > Everything else (all the interesting stuff) > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1840688 > <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1840688> > > I expect committers will be mostly interested in the last link above. >
