Re: 2.4.x and 2.6.x ... next steps

[Jim Jagielski]

> On Sep 12, 2018, at 10:27 AM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> 
> wrote:
> 
> I feel myself in agreement with Bill that trunk needs to be where 2.5.x is 
> born.
> 

It is. That should be clear in the proposal.

What should also be clear is that there is a LOT in trunk that should be in 
2.4.x and has nothing to do with 2.5/2.6/3.0/next-gen. So backporting that 
stuff HELPS midwifing 2.5/2.6!