On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 01:30:25PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > On 5/18/21 11:52 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > > On 5/17/21 11:36 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > >> Hi, all; > >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > >> > >> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > >> candidate tarball as 2.4.48: > >> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > >> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > >> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > >> > >> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > >> sha1: b581bcfdd939fe77c3821f7ad3863c7307374919 *httpd-2.4.48.tar.gz > >> sha256: 315c0bc50206b866fb17c2cdc28c1973765a8d59ca168b80286e8cb077d0510e > >> *httpd-2.4.48.tar.gz > >> sha512: > >> 91980f757fc0dede8c6cbf54ed973f82a63098aa50d0fce15fe3537687b4ffbb48ed50cdb4ae14eb4a8703450f032daf73f4f3d5e2dd0f75721948e12a9c6dfb > >> *httpd-2.4.48.tar.gz > >> > >> The SVN tag is '2.4.48' at r1889975. > >> > > -1 for me. > > new mod_md doesn't build with LibreSSL because nor EVP_PKEY_X25519 nor > > EVP_PKEY_X448 are defined. > > I have asked LibreSSL guys if they will add EVP_PKEY_* constants to evp.h. > > Did 2.4.46 build with LibreSSL?
Looks like this is new in 2.4.48 but both LibreSSL users can work around this or not build mod_md, it doesn't seem like a showstopper. Giovanni, if you care about keeping Libre support alive can you work out how to get it building in Travis? It's daft if we are only hitting these compat issues in post-roll testing. Regards, Joe
