On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 07:43:51PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 18/05/2021 à 14:57, Giovanni Bechis a écrit : > > On 5/18/21 1:53 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > >> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 01:30:25PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 5/18/21 11:52 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > >>>> On 5/17/21 11:36 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > >>>>> Hi, all; > >>>>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > >>>>> > >>>>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > >>>>> candidate tarball as 2.4.48: > >>>>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > >>>>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > >>>>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > >>>>> > >>>>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > >>>>> sha1: b581bcfdd939fe77c3821f7ad3863c7307374919 *httpd-2.4.48.tar.gz > >>>>> sha256: > >>>>> 315c0bc50206b866fb17c2cdc28c1973765a8d59ca168b80286e8cb077d0510e > >>>>> *httpd-2.4.48.tar.gz > >>>>> sha512: > >>>>> 91980f757fc0dede8c6cbf54ed973f82a63098aa50d0fce15fe3537687b4ffbb48ed50cdb4ae14eb4a8703450f032daf73f4f3d5e2dd0f75721948e12a9c6dfb > >>>>> *httpd-2.4.48.tar.gz > >>>>> > >>>>> The SVN tag is '2.4.48' at r1889975. > >>>>> > >>>> -1 for me. > >>>> new mod_md doesn't build with LibreSSL because nor EVP_PKEY_X25519 nor > >>>> EVP_PKEY_X448 are defined. > >>>> I have asked LibreSSL guys if they will add EVP_PKEY_* constants to > >>>> evp.h. > > Hi Giovanni, > > From my point of view, we do not *officially* support LibreSSL. The > mod_ssl doc is only about OpenSSL. I've found no reference to it, apart > from the many LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER in the code itself. > So, even if the LibreSSL built was completely broken, I wouldn't > consider it as a showstoper. > > If we consider that Linking against LibreSSL is a must have, then, at > least we should update the doc. > I have several Apache httpd + LibreSSL setups and I would like to keep them working I will work to have LibreSSL compatibility as much as I can.
> >>> > >>> Did 2.4.46 build with LibreSSL? > >> > > 2.4.46 and 2.4.47 builds. > > >> Looks like this is new in 2.4.48 but both LibreSSL users can work around > >> this or not build mod_md, it doesn't seem like a showstopper. > >> > > no real showstopper for me, please remove my "-1" vote. > > > > Let us know if you want to change your vote to something else (see [1]) > or if you just don't vote for this release. > +1 for me then, I can backport patches where needed. > > > >> Giovanni, if you care about keeping Libre support alive can you work out > >> how to get it building in Travis? It's daft if we are only hitting > >> these compat issues in post-roll testing. > >> > > I agree and I will take a look at it. > > Just great :) > Thx. > > And then, updating the doc would worth it ;-) > This will be one of the first steps. Giovanni > CJ > > [1]: > https://apache.org/foundation/voting.html#expressing-votes-1-0-1-and-fractions >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
