Thanks for prodding this... I still support the effort and offer to help with whatever grunt work may arise.
> On Oct 18, 2026, at 9:51 AM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have been thinking of coming back to this and working on the release > process aspect. Once it looks reasonably in hand against a fork I'd > like to move forward and maybe cut a low-stakes / non security > release. > > I wanted to give folks one more chance to raise any blockers/concerns, > either inline here or in the cwiki below: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/HTTPD/pages/311628229/Read+Write+git+migration > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 3:52 AM Ruediger Pluem <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 8/19/24 7:44 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >>>> On Aug 19, 2024, at 8:22 AM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> To bring the convo back here out of cwiki -- in a world where we moved >>>> to read/write git, with reviews happening in the context of a pull >>>> request, does anyone else have any feelings about ditching or keeping >>>> the STATUS file? >>> >>> I created STATUS to help drive dev conversations toward a release. >>> A resource-based window on open issues, organized by tag or priority, >>> would be just as good and easier to maintain. +1 to a replacement. >>> >>> I suggest leaving STATUS as a static file containing a link to the new >>> resource >>> and maybe examples of using the GH API to download a local copy of issues. >> >> Let's try this. If it does not work out we just change it to something else >> that works better. >> >> Regards >> >> Rüdiger >> > > > -- > Eric Covener > [email protected] -- Jim "This is an outrage!" Tony Harrison
