You're right. It does look feasible. Scrolling down the page shows the answer. :) Btw, unfortunately the email list won't show images. If you want to share screenshots, you'd need to post a link to it. (like via a github gist or sth)
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:55 AM wangxianghu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Raymond: > Thanks for asking. Recently, I learned the usage of azure pipeline and > referred to how Apache Flink does, which seems to be feasible. > I haven't investigated GitHub action, since azure pipeline is feasible. > > Besides, Azure do provide free plan for open source project. > The same page you mentioned: > > https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/devops/azure-devops-services/ > > > At 2020-12-23 16:09:14, "Raymond Xu" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Hi @vinoyang @wangxianghu, > > > >just want to follow up on this work. Any update on the current status? > >Particularly, I'm interested in > > > >1. does Azure provide free plan for open source project? from this page > ><https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/devops/azure-devops-services/> > >I see only 1 parallel job allowed for free plan > >2. have we explored GitHub Actions for this purpose? looks like it has > >similar features as Azure Pipelines and also free to open source > ><https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/github/setting-up-and-managing-billing-and-payments-on-github/about-billing-for-github-actions>. > >I suppose it is also first class supported by GitHub. I think it could be a > >good candidate for all CI/CD work: testing, nightly build, perf benchmark, > >etc > > > >Thanks. > > > >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 7:28 AM Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> No worries. If you could share how far you got and what the next steps are > >> and if you still think its the right direction, it ll help the person > >> picking this up :) > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 3:52 AM vino yang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Sorry. > >> > Due to busy work, I interrupted this verification work. I will let > >> > @wangxianghu continue to follow up this work. > >> > > >> > Best, > >> > Vino > >> > > >> > Vinoth Chandar <[email protected]> 于2020年12月11日周五 下午3:25写道： > >> > > >> > > Thanks for kicking this off, Gary! > >> > > > >> > > Thanks to Raymond, the CI tests are leaner and more parellelized now. > >> > But I > >> > > do see that we hit travis queuing a lot. > >> > > Is that what you are targeting primarily? > >> > > > >> > > We were exploring a move to Azure CI Pipelines to get more compute > >> power > >> > > allocated at some point. > >> > > @vinoyang , IIRC, you were driving this? Could you please share your > >> > > experience? > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 9:53 PM Gary Li <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hi all, > >> > > > > >> > > > I am seeing we have a boost on PRs recently. That's great news that > >> > more > >> > > > developers joined the Hudi community. > >> > > > > >> > > > On the other hand, the Travis build backlog was growing as well. As > >> we > >> > > > grow, we need to scale the CI/CD pipeline soon. So I'd like to start > >> a > >> > > > discussion here. > >> > > > > >> > > > Do we have any ongoing work on this topic? Anyone from larger open > >> > source > >> > > > projects like Spark/Flink e.t.c can share experience about how they > >> > > handle > >> > > > this problem? > >> > > > > >> > > > Any thoughts are appreciated. > >> > > > > >> > > > Best, > >> > > > > >> > > > Gary Li > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >
