Yes, thanks for reminding. I'll post a link next time :)
At 2020-12-24 03:32:03, "Raymond Xu" <xu.shiyan.raym...@gmail.com> wrote: >You're right. It does look feasible. Scrolling down the page shows the >answer. :) >Btw, unfortunately the email list won't show images. If you want to share >screenshots, you'd need to post a link to it. (like via a github gist or >sth) > >On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:55 AM wangxianghu <wxhj...@126.com> wrote: > >> Hi Raymond: >> Thanks for asking. Recently, I learned the usage of azure pipeline and >> referred to how Apache Flink does, which seems to be feasible. >> I haven't investigated GitHub action, since azure pipeline is feasible. >> >> Besides, Azure do provide free plan for open source project. >> The same page you mentioned: >> >> https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/devops/azure-devops-services/ >> >> >> At 2020-12-23 16:09:14, "Raymond Xu" <xu.shiyan.raym...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >Hi @vinoyang @wangxianghu, >> > >> >just want to follow up on this work. Any update on the current status? >> >Particularly, I'm interested in >> > >> >1. does Azure provide free plan for open source project? from this page >> ><https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/devops/azure-devops-services/> >> >I see only 1 parallel job allowed for free plan >> >2. have we explored GitHub Actions for this purpose? looks like it has >> >similar features as Azure Pipelines and also free to open source >> ><https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/github/setting-up-and-managing-billing-and-payments-on-github/about-billing-for-github-actions>. >> >I suppose it is also first class supported by GitHub. I think it could be a >> >good candidate for all CI/CD work: testing, nightly build, perf benchmark, >> >etc >> > >> >Thanks. >> > >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 7:28 AM Vinoth Chandar <vin...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> >> No worries. If you could share how far you got and what the next steps are >> >> and if you still think its the right direction, it ll help the person >> >> picking this up :) >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 3:52 AM vino yang <yanghua1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > Sorry. >> >> > Due to busy work, I interrupted this verification work. I will let >> >> > @wangxianghu continue to follow up this work. >> >> > >> >> > Best, >> >> > Vino >> >> > >> >> > Vinoth Chandar <vin...@apache.org> 于2020年12月11日周五 下午3:25写道： >> >> > >> >> > > Thanks for kicking this off, Gary! >> >> > > >> >> > > Thanks to Raymond, the CI tests are leaner and more parellelized now. >> >> > But I >> >> > > do see that we hit travis queuing a lot. >> >> > > Is that what you are targeting primarily? >> >> > > >> >> > > We were exploring a move to Azure CI Pipelines to get more compute >> >> power >> >> > > allocated at some point. >> >> > > @vinoyang , IIRC, you were driving this? Could you please share your >> >> > > experience? >> >> > > >> >> > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 9:53 PM Gary Li <garyli1...@outlook.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > > Hi all, >> >> > > > >> >> > > > I am seeing we have a boost on PRs recently. That's great news that >> >> > more >> >> > > > developers joined the Hudi community. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > On the other hand, the Travis build backlog was growing as well. As >> >> we >> >> > > > grow, we need to scale the CI/CD pipeline soon. So I'd like to start >> >> a >> >> > > > discussion here. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Do we have any ongoing work on this topic? Anyone from larger open >> >> > source >> >> > > > projects like Spark/Flink e.t.c can share experience about how they >> >> > > handle >> >> > > > this problem? >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Any thoughts are appreciated. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Best, >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Gary Li >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
