IMO, that is like "Can we clean a toilet with a toothbrush?"
Yes, we can, but who wants to offer up their toothbrush? Not me! :-) The question to me is: "Can we get the iBATIS jars to the maven repository without doing a maven build, and is it the right way to do it?" Yes we can, but no it's not. Larry On 2/14/07, Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Can we get the iBATIS jars to the maven repository without doing a maven build?" Yes On 2/14/07, Jeff Butler < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In my own little perfect world, I'm -1. The iBATIS ant build is so simple now - I hate to see it mucked up just to supply the Maven meta-bs as Clinton so eloquently put it. > > However, I would like to see the iBATIS jars in the Maven repository - if for no other reason than to help those who can't figure out how to set a classpath without a tool. If a maven build makes that possible then I guess I'd be +2, but reluctantly. > > I think that supporting both Ant and Maven is problematical - seems like we should just pick one for simplicity going forward. > > So I guess I can't give a single vote. Can someone definitively answer this question: Can we get the iBATIS jars to the maven repository without doing a maven build? That's the key point for me. > > Jeff Butler > > > > On 2/14/07, Clinton Begin < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > It strikes me that there was enough discussion around the Maven build > > to warrant an official vote for Maven support. > > > > +2 => Replace our Ant build entirely with a Maven build. > > > > +1 => Support Maven by including a Maven build alongside our Ant build. > > > > 0 => Don't care or I don't know enough about Maven to decide. > > > > -1 => Do not support maven. > > > > Cheers, > > Clinton > > > >
