The way i see it, if we consider something stable we push it out as GA. If for some reason it fails to uphold to the quality standards of GA we can always downgrade it to beta, fix it, and push it out a new release as GA. The whole GA thing has more to do with terminology than anything. So as far as I'm concerned GA is implicit when we release something. Am I wrong?
B On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Kai Grabfelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > is there anything that speak against promoting 2.3.4 (or possibly at least > 2.3.3) as GA? 2.3.4 is already in > the maven repos. > > Regards > > Kai > >
