Also, here is our policy: http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/IBATIS/iBATIS+Release+Process
Did we vote on 3.4? If not, we should probably do that so that we can consider it GA. B On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > The way i see it, if we consider something stable we push it out as GA. If > for some reason it fails to uphold to the quality standards of GA we can > always downgrade it to beta, fix it, and push it out a new release as GA. > The whole GA thing has more to do with terminology than anything. So as far > as I'm concerned GA is implicit when we release something. Am I wrong? > > B > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Kai Grabfelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> is there anything that speak against promoting 2.3.4 (or possibly at least >> 2.3.3) as GA? 2.3.4 is already in >> the maven repos. >> >> Regards >> >> Kai >> >> >
