+1 for deprecation and removal by 2.0 version. - Ajantha
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 4:23 AM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 as well for deprecation > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 1:08 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > >> Perfect ! Thanks ! >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 7:18 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Thanks for the feedback JB! Yes, I was originally intended to use this >> thread to collect any concern of us flagging this catalog as deprecated. >> > >> > If I don't receive any objection in the next 5 days, I will go ahead to >> do that, and let the default 2 release full deprecation window apply. And I >> will revive this thread again to double check when we plan to remove it >> after 2 releases. >> > >> > Best, >> > Jack Ye >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 2:33 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Jack, >> >> >> >> If we have a very low number of users and propose they move to another >> >> catalog, that makes sense to me. >> >> >> >> I think we can first flag DynamodbCatalog as deprecated (providing a >> >> message to the community and give time for users to move forward), >> >> then we can plan a vote later to remove it. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> JB >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 7:11 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Hi everyone, >> >> > >> >> > As discussed in community sync, I am raising a thread about >> potentially deprecating DynamodbCatalog. >> >> > >> >> > I added it back in the day because of some customer collaboration >> effort. Later another implementation was also added in pybut at this point >> the specific customer has forked the implementation and is maintaining >> their own catalog. >> >> > >> >> > Please comment if you have any production dependency or have any >> concern about deprecating for this catalog, and we can discuss the path >> forward. >> >> > >> >> > Best, >> >> > Jack Ye >> >
