Looks like Ajantha already reverted it now in https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9815 so let's just keep it as is for 1.5.
As I listed in the PR just now, I think there are 3 options: 1. Salesforce can move it to a Salesforce GitHub domain and own it 2. my team can potentially move it to an Amazon-owned GitHub domain (together with GlueCatalog) and collaborate there 3. we move it with other catalogs together to the new separated repo For option 3, what is the latest plan? I remember we want to have more devlist discussions from the last community sync, has anyone volunteered to lead the discussion thread? -Jack On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:21 AM Ryan Blue <b...@tabular.io> wrote: > I don't think we need to revert a deprecation. Deprecation gives people > time to move off of something that won't be supported in the future and it > doesn't make sense to me to delay letting people know that. > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:34 PM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Looks like Salesforce is using the DynamoDB catalog in production. >> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9783#issuecomment-1965781361 >> >> They can provide more details. >> >> How about *reverting* the Deprecation for 1.5.0 release? >> If finally concluded to be deprecated, can we deprecate it in 1.6.0? >> I just don't want the upcoming RC4 to fail because of this and do RC5 >> just for it. >> >> - Ajantha >> >> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 2:44 AM Drew <img...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey everyone, >>> >>> Since it seems like we have met a consensus here, I can pick up the >>> deprecation of DynamoDbCatalog. I submitted a PR that marks the catalog as >>> deprecated and schedules it for complete removal in two releases starting >>> with 1.6.0. >>> >>> Pr: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9783 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Drew >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 5:24 PM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 for deprecation and removal by 2.0 version. >>>> >>>> - Ajantha >>>> >>>> On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 4:23 AM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 as well for deprecation >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 1:08 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Perfect ! Thanks ! >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 7:18 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Thanks for the feedback JB! Yes, I was originally intended to use >>>>>> this thread to collect any concern of us flagging this catalog as >>>>>> deprecated. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > If I don't receive any objection in the next 5 days, I will go >>>>>> ahead to do that, and let the default 2 release full deprecation window >>>>>> apply. And I will revive this thread again to double check when we plan >>>>>> to >>>>>> remove it after 2 releases. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Best, >>>>>> > Jack Ye >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 2:33 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Hi Jack, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> If we have a very low number of users and propose they move to >>>>>> another >>>>>> >> catalog, that makes sense to me. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> I think we can first flag DynamodbCatalog as deprecated (providing >>>>>> a >>>>>> >> message to the community and give time for users to move forward), >>>>>> >> then we can plan a vote later to remove it. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Regards >>>>>> >> JB >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 7:11 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Hi everyone, >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > As discussed in community sync, I am raising a thread about >>>>>> potentially deprecating DynamodbCatalog. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > I added it back in the day because of some customer >>>>>> collaboration effort. Later another implementation was also added in >>>>>> pybut >>>>>> at this point the specific customer has forked the implementation and is >>>>>> maintaining their own catalog. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Please comment if you have any production dependency or have any >>>>>> concern about deprecating for this catalog, and we can discuss the path >>>>>> forward. >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Best, >>>>>> >> > Jack Ye >>>>>> >>>>> > > -- > Ryan Blue > Tabular >
