My only concern about using this tool is that we may be further separating where discussion happens and not everyone will see what's happening. Usually, the dev list is the canonical place for discussions. Is that not a good solution? What differentiates what we would use github discussions for vs the dev list?
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 6:52 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner <etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: > I think GH discussions would be great to have on the Iceberg repo(s), > so +1 from my side on this. > > Eduard > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 8:14 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> It's also possible to create a user mailing list if it helps. >> >> >> I'm neutral to this option. Seems we are actually missing the user mail >> list. >> >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 1:50 PM Xuanwo <xua...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> > Regarding the discussion tab, it sounds good to me. It's pretty >>> straight forward to do by editing .asf.yaml. >>> >>> I tried this before. But the asf.yaml doesn't support controling >>> discussion yet. >>> We need the help from infra team. >>> >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=INFRA&title=git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-GitHubDiscussions >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 13:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> > Hi >>> > >>> > It's also possible to create a user mailing list if it helps. >>> > >>> > Regarding the discussion tab, it sounds good to me. It's pretty >>> > straight forward to do by editing .asf.yaml. >>> > >>> > Regards >>> > JB >>> > >>> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 5:18 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi: >>> >> >>> >> Recently we have observed more and more user interested in >>> iceberg-rust, and they have many questions about it, for example the >>> status, relationship with others such pyiceberg. Slack is a great place to >>> discussion, but is not friendly for long discussion and not easy to >>> comment. We can also encourage user to use github issue, but it's easy to >>> mix with true issues, e.g. feature tracking, bug tracking, etc. >>> >> >>> >> So I propose to enable the discussion tab for repos of iceberg and >>> subprojects such as iceberg-rust, pyiceberg, iceberg-go. >>> >>> -- >>> Xuanwo >>> >>> https://xuanwo.io/ >>> >> -- Ryan Blue Databricks
