Thanks for raising this. I would also prefer discussions over a user
mailing-list since it has a lower barrier. We could also first enable this
on Iceberg-rust and evaluate it after a while to see the added value and
then decide for Python and Java? WDYT?

Kind regards,
Fokko

Op wo 10 jul 2024 om 10:14 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>:

> Yes and no :)
>
> It's a beta feature. My point is that we can enabled GitHub Discussion
> easily, and depending of the timing, asf.yaml support will be added.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 7:49 AM Xuanwo <xua...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Regarding the discussion tab, it sounds good to me. It's pretty
> > straight forward to do by editing .asf.yaml.
> >
> > I tried this before. But the asf.yaml doesn't support controling
> discussion yet.
> > We need the help from infra team.
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=INFRA&title=git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-GitHubDiscussions
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 13:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > It's also possible to create a user mailing list if it helps.
> > >
> > > Regarding the discussion tab, it sounds good to me. It's pretty
> > > straight forward to do by editing .asf.yaml.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 5:18 AM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi:
> > >>
> > >> Recently we have observed more and more user interested in
> iceberg-rust, and they have many questions about it, for example the
> status, relationship with others such pyiceberg. Slack is a great place to
> discussion, but is not friendly for long discussion and not easy to
> comment. We can also encourage user to use github issue, but it's easy to
> mix with true issues, e.g. feature tracking, bug tracking, etc.
> > >>
> > >> So I propose to enable the discussion tab for  repos of iceberg and
> subprojects such as iceberg-rust, pyiceberg, iceberg-go.
> >
> > --
> > Xuanwo
> >
> > https://xuanwo.io/
>

Reply via email to