> posting/content management privileges to the Iceberg YouTube channel for these meetup recordings
This sounds reasonable to me, when the meetup is recurring. So I am good with doing this for the Seattle meetup series. We have technically already done so for Bits for the community sync meeting series. Thoughts? -Jack On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 1:23 PM Jonathan Leang <leangjonat...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey all, > > I have a question related to some questions about shared administration of > Apache Iceberg social/marketing channels such as YouTube in this specific > instance. Kevin Liu and I have organized the first Seattle Iceberg meetups > and it looks like there will be a steady stream of technical talks about > things like proposals and more generally recent developments in the > project. Bits (Brian Olsen) helped us get the most recent meetup posted on > the Apache Iceberg YouTube channel but we're hoping not to bother him every > month. We're wondering if Kevin and/or I can get posting/content management > privileges to the Iceberg YouTube channel for these meetup recordings. > > We asked Bits and he replied: > It would be good to have some trusted people + PMC coordinate the social + > marketing channels. In many projects I either see nobody really owning it > and it becomes abandoned over time and other times I see it primarily run > through one or two companies or individuals which doesn't scale. It would > be great if a small group of trusted volunteers comanage these marketing > channels with similar guidelines on how to coordinate when, channel > "voice", and following standard ASF COC guidelines, etc... > > Perhaps Bits and/or a PMC member could take on the responsibility of > building out the guidance on how to run this without too much overlap or > interference as it scales out. > > Thanks! > Jonathan Leang >
