+1 (non-binding) Thanks. JackyLee
Szehon Ho <[email protected]> 于2025年9月12日周五 05:39写道： > > +1 > > Thanks > Szehon > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 1:54 PM Scott Haines <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> +1. >> >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:32 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 9:28 PM Prashant Singh <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Prashant Singh >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 6:58 PM Steve <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 non-binding >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 20:16 Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 8:14 AM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1(binding). LGTM, esp. given that the standard positional deletes with >>>>>>> (filename, row-position) will continue to exist. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yufei >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 5:37 PM Yuya Ebihara >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 6:06 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1, thanks Peter >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 2:08 PM Wing Yew Poon >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 12:48 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 to removing this from the Java implementation and API. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:08 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 9:30 AM Russell Spitzer >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:58 AM Péter Váry >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Position Deletes With Row (PDWR) feature, originally >>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced in the Iceberg V2 specification, has been deprecated >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in V3. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Following the discussion in the previous thread [1], we propose >>>>>>>>>>>>>> deprecating PDWR in the Java implementation starting with the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Iceberg 1.11.0 release. We plan to remove PDWR support entirely >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the Java implementation beginning with Iceberg 1.12.0. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> While PDWR will remain part of the V2 spec, the Java >>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation will no longer write PDWR delete files. It will >>>>>>>>>>>>>> only support reading the position and file name columns from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> previously created delete files or those generated by other >>>>>>>>>>>>>> engines. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For reference, the proposed changes are available here [2]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your vote. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/8jw6pb2vq3ghmdqf1yvy8n5n6gg1fq5s >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14045
