Thanks everyone for the votes! Merged the PR too Péter Váry <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. szept. 15., H, 10:04):
> With 15 +1 votes (7 binding) and no -1 or +0 votes, this vote passes. > > Jacky Lee <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. szept. 12., P, > 3:53): > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks. >> JackyLee >> >> Szehon Ho <[email protected]> 于2025年9月12日周五 05:39写道： >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > Thanks >> > Szehon >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 1:54 PM Scott Haines <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:32 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 9:28 PM Prashant Singh < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >> >>>> >> >>>> Best, >> >>>> Prashant Singh >> >>>> >> >>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 6:58 PM Steve <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> +1 non-binding >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 20:16 Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 8:14 AM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> +1(binding). LGTM, esp. given that the standard positional >> deletes with (filename, row-position) will continue to exist. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Yufei >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 5:37 PM Yuya Ebihara < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 6:06 AM Amogh Jahagirdar < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> +1, thanks Peter >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 2:08 PM Wing Yew Poon >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 12:48 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 to removing this from the Java implementation and API. >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:08 AM Steven Wu < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 9:30 AM Russell Spitzer < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:58 AM Péter Váry < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Position Deletes With Row (PDWR) feature, originally >> introduced in the Iceberg V2 specification, has been deprecated in V3. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Following the discussion in the previous thread [1], we >> propose deprecating PDWR in the Java implementation starting with the >> Iceberg 1.11.0 release. We plan to remove PDWR support entirely from the >> Java implementation beginning with Iceberg 1.12.0. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> While PDWR will remain part of the V2 spec, the Java >> implementation will no longer write PDWR delete files. It will only support >> reading the position and file name columns from previously created delete >> files or those generated by other engines. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For reference, the proposed changes are available here [2]. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your vote. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/8jw6pb2vq3ghmdqf1yvy8n5n6gg1fq5s >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14045 >> >
