With 15 +1 votes (7 binding) and no -1 or +0 votes, this vote passes. Jacky Lee <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. szept. 12., P, 3:53):
> +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks. > JackyLee > > Szehon Ho <[email protected]> 于2025年9月12日周五 05:39写道： > > > > +1 > > > > Thanks > > Szehon > > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 1:54 PM Scott Haines <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> +1. > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:32 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 (non-binding) > >>> > >>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 9:28 PM Prashant Singh < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> Prashant Singh > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 6:58 PM Steve <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 non-binding > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 20:16 Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 8:14 AM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1(binding). LGTM, esp. given that the standard positional deletes > with (filename, row-position) will continue to exist. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Yufei > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 5:37 PM Yuya Ebihara < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 6:06 AM Amogh Jahagirdar < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> +1, thanks Peter > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 2:08 PM Wing Yew Poon > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 12:48 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 to removing this from the Java implementation and API. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:08 AM Steven Wu < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 9:30 AM Russell Spitzer < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:58 AM Péter Váry < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Position Deletes With Row (PDWR) feature, originally > introduced in the Iceberg V2 specification, has been deprecated in V3. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Following the discussion in the previous thread [1], we > propose deprecating PDWR in the Java implementation starting with the > Iceberg 1.11.0 release. We plan to remove PDWR support entirely from the > Java implementation beginning with Iceberg 1.12.0. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> While PDWR will remain part of the V2 spec, the Java > implementation will no longer write PDWR delete files. It will only support > reading the position and file name columns from previously created delete > files or those generated by other engines. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For reference, the proposed changes are available here [2]. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your vote. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8jw6pb2vq3ghmdqf1yvy8n5n6gg1fq5s > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14045 >
